🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Escape backticks in sanitizeInput #57
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "sentinel-sanitize-backticks-8724165683106093269"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
🛡️ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix XSS risk via backticks
🚨 Severity: HIGH
💡 Vulnerability: User input containing backticks was not sanitized, which could lead to injection attacks in environments using JavaScript template literals or unquoted HTML attributes.
🎯 Impact: Attackers could potentially inject malicious code if the unsanitized input is used in vulnerable contexts (e.g., EmailJS templates or other backend processing).
🔧 Fix: Updated
sanitizeInputto explicitly replace backticks with`.✅ Verification: Added a unit test in
src/utils/security.test.tsto confirm backticks are escaped. Ranpnpm exec vitest run src/utils/security.test.tsand confirmed it passes. Ran full suite to ensure no regressions.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8724165683106093269 started by @ragusa-it
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.
When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.
I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!
For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with
@jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.
For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.
Pull request closed